Last week we launched a special report series on how liquid cooling is allowing the data center industry to leverage density and space more effectively while still being able to scale critical resources. This week, we’ll take a look at how liquid cooling adoption has evolved over time.
Download the full report.
Even though technology moves at a staggering pace, it’s critical to understand how the components of data center efficiency have evolved. To that extent, let’s focus on data center cooling and airflow management. Believe it or not, it’s only until recently that real airflow best practices have become established. Data center airflow management first became a conversation point in the mid-1990s when the futility of the then-common method of organizing computer rooms with all racks facing front. Data center engineers implemented the first “intentional” hot and cold aisle organization of server racks. Having established the value of separating cold aisles from hot aisles, a science of best practices quickly emerged to optimize the benefits of that separation.
In 2005, Oracle and Intel reported on case study projects in which they had deployed server cabinets with vertical exhaust ducts (or chimneys) bridging from the cabinets to a suspended ceiling return air path, thereby wholly separating the return air from the rest of the data center. While both studies reported on the effectiveness of the cooling and the opportunity for higher rack density, what was most noteworthy was that they both cited measured evidence of reduced cooling energy costs.
Shortly after that, Lawrence Berkeley National Labs reported on a June 2006 study at the National Energy Research Scientific Computing Center in Oakland, California. This study included a cold aisle containment experiment resulting in measurable savings on cooling unit fan energy, chiller plant energy at a higher set point, and increased economizer hours. From this point on, the conversation on data center airflow management changed from a primary focus on effectiveness to a focus on efficiency.
Then, in 2010, ASHRAE 90.1, Energy Standard for Buildings except for Low Rise Residential, eliminated the process exemption for data centers and added prescriptions for economization, variable flow on fans, and restrictions on humidity management as a reflection of evolving best practices for data center airflow management. As data center airflow management reached mainstream status in the past few years, the evolution of this field has focused on fine-tuning all the developments of the preceding decade.
What’s changed? During the ‘90s and mid-2000s, designers and operators worried about the ability of air-cooling technologies to cool increasingly power-hungry servers. With design densities approaching or exceeding 5 kilowatts (kW) per cabinet, some believed that operators would have to resort to rear-door heat exchangers and other in-row cooling mechanisms to keep up with the increasing densities.
Still, for decades, computer rooms and data centers utilized raised floor systems to deliver cold air to servers. Cold air from a computer room air conditioner (CRAC) or computer room air handler (CRAH) pressurized the space below the raised floor. Perforated tiles provided a means for the cold air to leave the plenum and enter the main space —ideally in front of server intakes. After passing through the server, the heated air returned to the CRAC/CRAH cooled, usually after mixing with the cold air.
New types of workloads simply require a new way to cool the servers on which they operate.
This system was the most common design for many years, data centers, and server cooling design. It is still employed today. But how effective is it for next-generation workloads and server designs? Can these systems support things like HPC and supercomputing?
When it comes to server cooling—the concept is straightforward. Heat must be removed from the server and IT equipment’s electrical components to avoid overheating the components. Simply put, if a server gets too hot, onboard logic will turn it off to prevent damage to the server.
But it’s not just heat you worry about. Some big data and analytics servers are highly sensitive and can be impacted by particle contamination. Still, in addition to the threats posed by physical particulate contamination, there are threats related to gaseous contamination. Certain gases can be corrosive to electronic components.
These types of traditional cooling systems will certainly still have their place in the data center. However, new types of workloads simply require a new way to cool the servers on which they operate.
According to the special report, new types of server cooling and data center management systems change how we bring efficiency into our data centers. Specifically, liquid cooling has introduced new levels of efficiency, capabilities around scale, and optimization around server workload delivery. Furthermore, you help remove the dangers around particulate or even gaseous contaminants when working with sensitive server equipment.
Let’s examine how next-generation liquid cooling impacts new and emerging use-cases with all of this in mind.
New use-cases that are increasing adoption of liquid cooling
In the past, liquid cooling was seen as a puzzle piece that often added complexity to the data center. With new design considerations and data center architectures, liquid cooling has taken on an entirely new form, making the solution far more consumable than ever before. We’ll discuss modern liquid cooling architecture in the next section. But it’s important to note that leaders are now working with liquid cooling systems designed to provide customers and solution providers with complete, holistic turnkey packages. These designs consist of purpose-built liquid cooling platforms, components, and software. Administrators are leveraging a liquid cooling plug-and-play architecture that seamlessly fits into modern data center architectures.
Here’s where these designs are being used:
Air cooling has been the preferred method in data centers. And for the most part, air cooling is still a viable option. For the most part, given low electronic densities and affordable energy prices, blowing cold air across electronics generally works. However, data center and compute solutions have become more compact. Additionally, high equipment densities are more common, making the need for better cooling methods imperative. Looking at data center design and integration with new systems, traditional computer room air conditioning is no longer enough in some new use-cases. Add in the rising energy costs and support advanced use-cases (mentioned above) can become rather expensive.
When working with integrated liquid cooling solutions, it’s important to note that liquids are more conductive to heat. This means that even a room-temperature liquid can cool more effectively than cold air. Simply put, since specialized cooling liquids have between 50 and 1,000 times the capacity to remove heat than air, the option to move to liquid cooling to support emerging use-cases is there.
Because liquid can remove heat more efficiently than air, operating at lower temperatures at higher clock speeds will allow for greater performing systems.
Understanding the Challenges In Air Cooling Specific Workloads
Although there is nothing wrong with air-cooled solutions, it’s more important than ever to understand the workloads and use-cases leveraging a specific type of cooling. As it relates to air-cooled designs, a significant challenge in supporting emerging use-cases revolves around five key factors.
(Source: Schneider Electric)
Download the full report, “The State of Data Center Cooling: A Key Point in Industry Evolution and Liquid Cooling” courtesy of TMGcore to learn how new data center and business requirements are shaping digital infrastructure. In our next article, we’ll explore new designs, standards, and liquid cooling systems. Catch up on the first article here.
TL;DR AI and cloud demand are expanding Latin America’s digital infrastructure opportunity while increasing requirements…
TL;DR Lightpath has entered the Greater Atlanta market with high-capacity Managed Bandwidth services. Wavelength and…
TL;DR Earnings release: Duos will report second quarter 2026 results after market close on Friday,…
TL;DR Defining the Distinction: “Modular” construction encompasses two main approaches—traditional prefabrication (assembling components like electrical…
TL;DR Transaction complete: Duos Technologies Group has completed the sale of its rail technology subsidiary,…
TL;DR To bypass slow grid interconnection queues and keep up with AI buildout timelines, hyperscale…